April 20, 2022· 50 min

The 1906 Dredging Law That May Be Holding Back The U.S. Economy

Orality
Model
79%
Oral-dominant (speeches, podcasts, storytelling)

Speaker Breakdown

HostTracy Alloway(1,362 words)
M:28%

Oral Indicators

Agonistic30%
very, absolutely, huge
Engagement57%
you, our, your
Memory Aids100%
listen, now, right
Repetition100%
they (79x), it's (55x), that's (49x)
Parallelism77%
And I'm Joe Weisenthal...., So I remember we did an episod..., And one of the things that cam...
Sound Patterns53%
47 question(s), alliteration: "markets move", alliteration: "barclays brief"
Formulaic Phrases2%
i mean

Literate Indicators

Hedging6%
could, maybe, may
Passive Voice12%
be focused, was signed, are owned
Abstract Nouns14%
investment, information, volatility
Subordination10%
because, whereas, thus
Sentence Length42%
Avg: 15.6 words/sentence
Word Complexity47%
investment, analyze, anticipate
Academic Markers3%
according to
Impersonal Style43%
512 personal pronouns found
Descriptive Style64%
monthly, carefully, recently

Description

The long grounding of the cargo ship The Ever Forward has shone a spotlight on the limited dredging equipment that exists in the U.S. The most powerful equipment here has significantly less capacity than what exists in Europe, or in the Suez Canal. What's more, the U.S. can't use foreign equipment due to a law known as the Foreign Dredging Act of 1906, which requires that any dredging done in the country, be done with U.S. labor on U.S.-owned ships. And while this has come to the fore due to the Ever Forward, the significance could be far wider. On this episode of the podcast we speak with Howard Gutman and Andrew Durant, both of whom are working to overturn the law. They argue that the restrictions on dredging equipment have significant negative ramifications for the environment, port capacity, and therefore the economy overall.  See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.